• Users Online: 144
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
   Table of Contents      
TUTORIAL
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 1  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 25-27

Pathophysiology of Mitral Valve Stenosis


Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesiology, AIIMS, Raipur, Chattisgarh, India

Date of Web Publication27-Jan-2015

Correspondence Address:
Praveen Kumar Neema
Department of Anaesthesiology, AIIMS, Raipur,Chattisgarh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2394-7438.150056

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Neema PK. Pathophysiology of Mitral Valve Stenosis. MAMC J Med Sci 2015;1:25-7

How to cite this URL:
Neema PK. Pathophysiology of Mitral Valve Stenosis. MAMC J Med Sci [serial online] 2015 [cited 2018 Aug 17];1:25-7. Available from: http://www.mamcjms.in/text.asp?2015/1/1/25/150056

Mitral valve stenosis (MS) can be congenital or acquired. Congenital MS is mainly the consequence of abnormalities of the subvalvular apparatus and occurs mainly in infants and children. [1] The congenital causes include parachute mitral valve deformity, congenital MS, supravalvular mitral ring and cor-triatriatum. The acquired causes of MS include rheumatic heart disease, left atrial (LA) myxoma, mitral annular calcification and thrombus formation. [1] Rheumatic MS is the most common form encountered in the developing world.

The rheumatic disease process causes contracture, scarring, and diffuse thickening and fibrosis of the leaflet tissue, fusion and fibrosis of the commissures and the subvalvular apparatus, and calcium deposition within the leaflets. [2] These processes result in a decrease in the effective mitral valve orifice area (MVA) and manifestation of clinical features of MS. The main mechanism of rheumatic MS is commissural fusion. Other lesions such as chordal shortening and fusion, leaflet thickening and its calcification contribute to the restriction of leaflet motion. Degenerative MS is frequently observed in the elderly individuals, which differs markedly from rheumatic MS; the main lesion in it being annular calcification. Isolated calcification of the mitral annulus has few or no hemodynamic consequences, and it more often causes mitral regurgitation than MS. In degenerative MS, commissural fusion is rare, and the valve thickening or calcification predominates at the base of the leaflets whereas in rheumatic MS, the tips are predominantly affected. Protruding calcification, reduction of normal mitral annular dilatation during diastole [3],[4] and impaired anterior mitral leaflet mobility, [5] are possible mechanisms responsible for the increased mitral gradient caused by mitral annular calcification.

Other rarely encountered causes of MS include inflammatory diseases (e.g. systemic lupus erythematous), infiltrative diseases, carcinoid heart disease, and drug-induced valve diseases. In these situations, leaflet thickening and restriction is the cause of stenosis, and the fusion of commissures is rare.


  Pathophysiology Top


The normal MVA is approximately 4-6 cm 2 . The shape of the pressure-volume loop in the presence of MS is normal [Figure 1]; however, the area of the loop and the end diastolic volume are significantly decreased. As the MVA decreases below 1.5 cm 2 , the symptoms of MS appear, and at a MVA below 1 cm 2 (severe MS) patients usually become symptomatic even at rest. [2] In patients with severe MS, a substantial increase in LA pressure and a gradient across the MV develops to accomplish left ventricular (LV) filling. The increased LA pressure passively elevates pulmonary venous and pulmonary capillary pressure and causes symptoms of pulmonary congestion. [6] Increased pressure and distension of the pulmonary veins and capillaries can lead to pulmonary edema as pulmonary venous pressure exceeds that of plasma oncotic pressure. In patients with chronic MV obstruction, however, even when it is severe and pulmonary venous pressure is very high, pulmonary edema may not occur owing to a marked decrease in pulmonary microvascular permeability. When the MVA is reduced to 1 cm 2 , a mean gradient of 20 mmHg across the stenosed MV is required to maintain normal cardiac output at rest. [7]
Figure 1: The left ventricular pressure-volume relationship in a normal patient (Dotted loop) and a patient with mitral stenosis (solid loop). (A) Mitral valve opens, (B) mitral valve closes, (C) aortic valve opens, (D) aortic valve closes, BC: Isovolumic contraction phase, DA: Isovolumic relaxation phase

Click here to view


Physiological increases in cardiac output to meet the demands of normal physical activity or excitement is achieved by increases in heart rate, myocardial contractility and venous return mediated by sympathetic stimulation. In a healthy individual, a modest (about 25%) increase in cardiac output results in ~ 40% increase in transmitral flow rate which is innocuous; however, in presence of severe MS, this increase in transmitral flow rate can cause a doubling of transmitral pressure gradient and marked elevation of pulmonary capillary pressure, which in some instances cause pulmonary edema. [8] Over a period, MS and persistently raised LA pressure result in LA dilatation, pulmonary venous hypertension, reflex pulmonary arteriolar constriction, obliterative changes in pulmonary vascular bed, pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH), right ventricular hypertrophy [6] right ventricular dilatation, tricuspid valve dysfunction, systemic venous congestion, compromised LV filling, and a state of subnormal cardiac output, [9] which fails to increase during exercise. Increased LA pressure and volume overload results in structural changes in LA, which alter its electrophysiological properties. [10] Additionally, the rheumatic process may lead to fibrosis of the internodal and interatrial tracts and damage to the sinoatrial node, these changes are believed to result in atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation occurs in 30-40% patients with MS. The arterial blood pressure (ABP) is usually maintained within normal range by increases in systemic vascular resistance (SVR). [11] Despite normal ABP, perfusion of various organs such as liver, kidney, etc., is often impaired that clinically manifests as increased serum creatinine, prothrombin time and icterus. At this stage, a mild decrease in SVR associated with the administration of sedatives and anesthetic agents can result in a precipitous hypotension.

PAH in MS is considered a sequel of increased LA pressure, reflex protective pulmonary arteriolar constriction, intimal hyperplasia, medial hypertrophy, and pulmonary arteriolar obliteration. A close scrutiny of reasons of increased LA pressure is necessary to understand the genesis of PAH. The pressure in a relatively thin-walled chamber like LA depends on several factors such as its stiffness, mechanical effects of its rhythmic contraction and relaxation, diastolic period, the quantity of blood entering and exiting it, and the net atrio-ventricular compliance, which include compliance of LA and LV, and compliance of the pulmonary venous system. For the increase in LA pressure to be substantial that develops in severe MS, the compliance of LA and pulmonary venous system should be low else the effect of damming of blood will dissipate in LA and pulmonary vascular bed and a substantial increase in LA pressure will not occur. In a study of 20 patients, a subgroup of patients was found who responded to exercise by a significant increase in PA pressure, in that subgroup the net atrio-ventricular compliance was found significantly low. [12] Apparently, in patients with MS, a wide spectrum of atrio-ventricular compliance exists-patients with low compliance and patients with normal compliance. Patients with low compliance develop severe PAH, severe increase in left atrial pressure (LAP) and symptoms of MS on exercise or in situations of increased cardiac output whereas patients with normal compliance remain asymptomatic in situations of increased cardiac output as the increased right ventricular (RV) stroke volume is accommodated in the compliant pulmonary venous bed.

At least two more factors, the role of LV relaxation on diastolic flow across the MV; and the role of RV stroke volume should be considered in the genesis of PAH in MS. Normally, the flow across the MV during diastole is passive but augmented by suction effect generated by LV relaxation during early diastole and by LA contraction during late diastole. [13],[14] Conceivably, in the presence of MS, the suction augmentation of diastolic flow will be reduced or ineffective. Apparently, to generate flow across the stenosed MV, the LA has to be pressurized, it is intuitive to consider that this pressurization of the LA is achieved by RV stroke volume generated during systole which in turn raises the mean pulmonary artery (PA) pressure and LA pressure and imparts potential energy to LA to achieve flow across the MV during diastole. However, over a period, reflex protective pulmonary arteriolar constriction and pulmonary arteriolar obliteration sets in, which result in further increases in pulmonary vascular resistance, PA pressure and remodeling (hypertrophy) of the RV to overcome raised pulmonary vascular resistance.

PAH in MS is benign and mechanical in the beginning and develops as a compensatory mechanism to overcome resistance offered by MS; later, it progresses secondary to pulmonary arteriolar constriction and pulmonary arteriolar obliteration. However, in a given patient it is not possible to know the contribution of each of these factors in the genesis of PAH. From this discussion, it is intuitive that sustained RV performance and PA pressure is essential to overcome resistance offered by MS and increased pulmonary vascular resistance to achieve LV filling and sustained LV stroke output. Based on this hypothesis, it is apparent that clinical situations that result in decreased RV performance/decompensation would result in low cardiac output whereas situations where RV performance remains unaffected or increases in response to pathophysiological stimulation might result in increased LA pressure, pulmonary congestion, edema, but sustained cardiac output. Apparently, in patients with MS, RV performance and response to varying clinical demands and basal atrio-ventricular compliance decides the clinical features. This explains varying clinical presentation associated with similar degree of tachycardia in patients having similar degree of MS. Apparently, patients who can mount RV performance and increase or maintain PA pressure in response to pathophysiologic challenges can maintain cardiac output but are likely to develop features of pulmonary congestion and edema whereas those who develop RV decompensation and cannot sustain PA pressure develop features of low cardiac output. This is typically seen in pregnancy wherein physiological changes in cardiac function make a pregnant patient more prone to pulmonary congestion and edema. Arguably, while anesthetizing these patients, it is important to sustain RV function else the patient may develop cardiovascular decompensation.


  Left Ventricular Function in Mitral Valve Stenosis Top


In majority of patients with MS, the LV contractility is normal and the ejection fraction increases normally during exercise; however, a few patients show decreased contractility of the posterobasal segment as the scarring of rheumatic process extends to it, in these patients the increase in ejection fraction secondary to exercise is slightly impaired. [15] The diastolic volume of the LV is within the low normal limit in all patients; however, the LV filling pressure may be increased in a few patients because of LV scarring and secondary to leftward shifting of inter-ventricular septum due to early filling of RV and RV distension. LV function may also be impaired due to the interdependency of the RV and the LV. A shift of the inter-ventricular septum toward the LV can be seen with elevated RV pressures causing RV and LV dysfunction. [16],[17]


  Clinical Features Top


Dyspnea on exertion due to an increase in the work of breathing is the key feature of MS; the physiological activities that demand increased cardiac output such as excitement, physical activity, pregnancy, etc., increase transmitral flow which in turn increases LAP and transmitral gradient and results in increased pulmonary venous pressure, pulmonary congestion and dyspnea. Tachycardia secondary to atrial fibrillation, fever, or any other reason decreases diastolic time, LA emptying and increases LA pressure and results in aggravation of dyspnea. In a few patients with severe MS, hemoptysis occurs and is due to rupture of pulmonary and bronchial veins. Hemoptysis typically occurs before the onset of PAH and a decrease in the PA dimensions protects the distal vasculature from volume overload.

 
  References Top

1.
Roberts WC, Perloff JK. Mitral valvular disease. A clinicopathologic survey of the conditions causing the mitral valve to function abnormally. Ann Intern Med 1972;77:939-75.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Maganti K, Rigolin VH, Sarano ME, Bonow RO. Valvular heart disease: Diagnosis and management. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:483-500.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Ramirez J, Flowers NC. Severe mitral stenosis secondary to massive calcification of the mitral annulus with unusual echocardiographic manifestations. Clin Cardiol 1980;3:284-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.
Osterberger LE, Goldstein S, Khaja F, Lakier JB. Functional mitral stenosis in patients with massive mitral annular calcification. Circulation 1981;64:472-6.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Muddassir SM, Pressman GS. Mitral annular calcification as a cause of mitral valve gradients. Int J Cardiol 2007;123:58-62.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Mittnacht AJ, Fanshawe M, Konstadt S. Anesthetic considerations in the patient with valvular heart disease undergoing noncardiac surgery. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008;12:33-59.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Rahimtoola SH, Durairaj A, Mehra A, Nuno I. Current evaluation and management of patients with mitral stenosis. Circulation 2002;106:1183-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Braunwald E, Turi ZG. Pathophysiology of mitral valve disease. In: Ionescu MS, Cohn LH, editors. Mitral Valve Disease. London: Butterworth's; 1985. p. 3-10.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Hugenholtz PG, Ryan TJ, Stein SW, Abelmann WH. The spectrum of pure mitral stenosis. Hemodynamic studies in relation to clinical disability. Am J Cardiol 1962;10:773-84.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Selzer A, Cohn KE. Natural history of mitral stenosis: A review. Circulation 1972;45:878-90.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Moore RA, Martin DE. Anesthetic management for the treatment of valvular heart disease. In: Hensley FA, Martin DE, editors. A Practical Approach to Cardiac Anesthesia. 2 nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1995. p. 296-325.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Schwammenthal E, Vered Z, Agranat O, Kaplinsky E, Rabinowitz B, Feinberg MS. Impact of atrioventricular compliance on pulmonary artery pressure in mitral stenosis: An exercise echocardiographic study. Circulation 2000;102:2378-84.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Neema PK, Misra S, Manikandan S, Rathod RC. 2-dimensional echocardiography and M-mode Doppler of the interatrial septum for assessment of left ventricular diastolic function. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2011;25:588-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.
Nishimura RA, Tajik AJ. Evaluation of diastolic filling of left ventricle in health and disease: Doppler echocardiography is the clinician's Rosetta Stone. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30:8-18.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Choi BW, Bacharach SL, Barbour DJ, Leon MB, McCarthy KE, Bonow RO. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction diastolic filling characteristics and exercise cardiac reserve in mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1995;75:526-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Popescu BA, Antonini-Canterin F, Temporelli PL, Giannuzzi P, Bosimini E, Gentile F, et al. Right ventricular functional recovery after acute myocardial infarction: Relation with left ventricular function and interventricular septum motion. GISSI-3 echo substudy. Heart 2005;91:484-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Saleh S, Liakopoulos OJ, Buckberg GD. The septal motor of biventricular function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;29 Suppl 1:S126-38.  Back to cited text no. 17
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Pathophysiology
Left Ventricular...
Clinical Features
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3734    
    Printed116    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded8    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal